Odd values (on 2 bikes) - must be doing something wrong
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:49 pm
Hi, I'm new to this forum so apologies if I'm in the wrong section or anything
I use a powerpod with a garmin 810 and garmin speed & cadence sensors (2 bikes, road & TT, with 2 different sets of sensors)Both bikes have had a best accuracy ride done and I've since been looking at the check accuracy function after out&back rides.
TT bike has pod under base bar (though initially was an out-front mount before I deleted profiles & started again). Road bike out front but has also been under the bars.
My problem is that power seems exaggerated when climbing and a little low when flat or descending, on both bikes. I don't have a direct power meter on either bike but I turbo on a supposedly very accurate machine and so think I have a reasonable feel on perceived effort. More than that, though, I get very odd numbers whenever I go out on rides after initial setup
When I try the check accuracy function after shortish rides on quite still days I get large changes being proposed by Isaac, including things like wind scaling over 3.5, which sounds very high from what I've read on here. I've deleted all profiles & repeated setup a couple of times but get the same thing happening
I will add that the roads I ride on are pretty variable surface and bumpy enough to have the pod read low or even zero on several stretches of any ride, though well under 5% of an entire ride (this is why I've changed around the mounts, to see if that helps but I don't think it alters the frequency of this happening)
Can "dropouts" make so much difference to the algorithm that my profiles go so far from the norm ?
Should I scrap the idea of checking accuracy and just delete, then rerun the best accuracy on a known smoother stretch, then never touch the software again ?
Thanks,
Mike
I use a powerpod with a garmin 810 and garmin speed & cadence sensors (2 bikes, road & TT, with 2 different sets of sensors)Both bikes have had a best accuracy ride done and I've since been looking at the check accuracy function after out&back rides.
TT bike has pod under base bar (though initially was an out-front mount before I deleted profiles & started again). Road bike out front but has also been under the bars.
My problem is that power seems exaggerated when climbing and a little low when flat or descending, on both bikes. I don't have a direct power meter on either bike but I turbo on a supposedly very accurate machine and so think I have a reasonable feel on perceived effort. More than that, though, I get very odd numbers whenever I go out on rides after initial setup
When I try the check accuracy function after shortish rides on quite still days I get large changes being proposed by Isaac, including things like wind scaling over 3.5, which sounds very high from what I've read on here. I've deleted all profiles & repeated setup a couple of times but get the same thing happening
I will add that the roads I ride on are pretty variable surface and bumpy enough to have the pod read low or even zero on several stretches of any ride, though well under 5% of an entire ride (this is why I've changed around the mounts, to see if that helps but I don't think it alters the frequency of this happening)
Can "dropouts" make so much difference to the algorithm that my profiles go so far from the norm ?
Should I scrap the idea of checking accuracy and just delete, then rerun the best accuracy on a known smoother stretch, then never touch the software again ?
Thanks,
Mike