Calibration support against DFPM

Post Reply
albafar
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:10 pm

Calibration support against DFPM

Post by albafar »

Today I thought I would try and see how close the PP was to my Powertap G3 Ant+. Turns out it is pretty close. But I can't seem to dial it in more precisely. If I focus on a flat section and reduce my CDA in Edit Profile it messes things up in other parts of the cal ride. I am confident John will be able to do some wizardry - please also explain how you go about it.
Attachments
TWH_30_09_2024_cal_HiDef2.ibr
(316.53 KiB) Downloaded 97 times
activity_17168111516.tcx
(358.6 KiB) Downloaded 93 times
Velocomp
Velocomp CEO
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:43 am

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by Velocomp »

Your ride file shows that your average wind speed is a bit higher than your average bike speed.
Screenshot 2024-10-02.png
Screenshot 2024-10-02.png (9.22 KiB) Viewed 2950 times
This would cause PP watts to be slightly higher
4.png
4.png (18.03 KiB) Viewed 2950 times
The way to fix this is to manually adjust the wind scaling factor in VA, such that wind speed equals bike speed. A wind scaling factor of 1.0 (determined by experiment) does the trick. DFPM and PP are within 1 w of each other:


3.png
3.png (72.27 KiB) Viewed 2950 times
Corrected ride file an profile attached.
Attachments
TWHcombined_corr_30_09_2024_cal_HiDef2.ibr
(315.37 KiB) Downloaded 91 times
corr.ibr
(315.38 KiB) Downloaded 91 times
2.png
2.png (9.22 KiB) Viewed 2950 times
John Hamann
albafar
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:10 pm

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by albafar »

Thanks a lot John. That makes a lot of sense. The average power gets dialed in. But how about the Max numbers - how come they are still so much apart?
Velocomp
Velocomp CEO
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:43 am

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by Velocomp »

In looking at your ride file I see that you had, one time only, a 4 second interval where your DFPM power was a bit higher than your PP power. Two points:

1) Assessing cycling performance (or power meter performance) on the basis of a single 4-second burst of power is not terribly meaningful

2) At extremely short intervals, HOW the power measurement device measures stress becomes important. It's possible your DFPM over reported the maximum stress it experienced; it's possible your frame flexed a little bit, causing PP to underreport watts. It's possible, even likely, that there was a combination of these factors, and perhaps others.

Who knows?

After looking at ride files for 20 years, the only thing I know for sure is that no measurement device is perfect, and that the benefits of power measurement are most reasonably assessed over the course of an entire ride.
Attachments
Screenshot .png
Screenshot .png (41.25 KiB) Viewed 2813 times
John Hamann
albafar
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:10 pm

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by albafar »

Thank you for elaborating on this John - highly appreciated.

As I thought it might have been a bit too windy on the test day, I went for another test ride yesterday where wind was a bit calmer. The O&B ride was slightly longer than the one earlier this week but with the input you had provided I've tried to tweak the profile as good as I could: Alligning Wind and Speed and reducing CDA a bit. If I had kept CDA I would have had to tweak crr, I assume. For the actual power numbers I guess it doesn't matter which variable I tweaked. But as I chose to ride with elbows semi-bent as I do most of the time I decided to tweak the CDA numbers. On the screen everything looks spot on to me - as good as it gets, I believe. Do you agree?
Attachments
TWH_04_10_2024_cal_HiDef.ibr
(119.13 KiB) Downloaded 85 times
Velocomp
Velocomp CEO
Posts: 7891
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:43 am

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by Velocomp »

Yes, this setup and calibration looks excellent!
John Hamann
albafar
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:10 pm

Re: Calibration support against DFPM

Post by albafar »

Awesome - I guess I've got my head around things now. Thank you so much for your continous support to the community John :D
Post Reply