Brodirt wrote:As I posted earlier in regard to tne NaN readings when I download data post ride from my Iaero and run an analysis I am getting very different numbers.
My during ride data might show avg. watts of 160, my pre-analysis download 152 and then when I run the analysis 182.
Is this indicative of a bad profile? If not, how can I trust my on bike data readout as being correct?
What you are seeing could be:
1) Bad pre-ride process
2) Bad calibration profile
3) Both 1 and 2
Pre-ride Process
-------------------
Each ride, you need to:
1- set the bike up for the ride, first (water bottles, miscellaneous equipment, tires pumped to desired pressure)
2- let the device acclimate to the environment (imho, this is the hardest for some of us to do)
3- set & verify the tilt (don't assume that the tilt is spot on--verify it)
4- zero the wind offset (if this is done in somewhat windy conditions, position the device so that the wind hits it from the side and not from the front or back)
Once the pre-ride process is complete DO NOT change the conditions.
======================================
Bad calibration profile
--------------------------
Re-do the calibration under proper environmental conditions (i.e., low to no wind, low to no traffic, road surface similar to where you ride most of the time, no rain):
1- Follow the pre-ride process
2- Capture 10 or more coast-downs
3- Capture a 2 mile (or more) out & back (minimum of 4 miles, total, travelled)
If you've followed the above, you should get better accuracy and consistency. If not, you may have a hardware problem or a problem where the bike is changing as you ride (i.e., inner tubes are leaking over the course of a ride, device mount is not "rock solid", handle bars rotating during a ride, magnets are not secure enough or placed close enough to sensors, etc.)