Page 1 of 1

Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 10:38 pm
by blp
I am considering getting a Cycleops Powercal for my winter bike. The Newton really doesn't like a lot of rain, especially a paceline in the rain.

I had a Powercal in the past, and over a long ride, the numbers are close. My winter rides are more recovery and base building.

To set up the Newton 5 to record/display the Powercal, do I use the DFPM "On" in setup?

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:24 am
by Velocomp
Hold on to your money for a few days. We will be announcing something very shortly...

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:14 pm
by BruceK
Velocomp wrote:Hold on to your money for a few days. We will be announcing something very shortly...
John, I too would like to know how to pair a PowerCal to a Newton (or Gen 3 iBike). I have merged PowerCal data in Isaac with Gen 3 data for comparison purposes. The PowerCal data can be quite similar to the iBike on endurance rides.

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:05 pm
by Velocomp
I believe the PowerCal transmits its "power" data over ANT+. Assuming it does, do a Scan and it will pair as a DFPM.

I've seen PowerCal data. Saying that it is similar to real power data over endurance rides is like saying the high temperature in New York City, averaged over a one year period, is about 60F. That may be a true statement, but it is not meaningful...

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:43 pm
by BruceK
Velocomp wrote:I believe the PowerCal transmits its "power" data over ANT+. Assuming it does, do a Scan and it will pair as a DFPM.

I've seen PowerCal data. Saying that it is similar to real power data over endurance rides is like saying the high temperature in New York City, averaged over a one year period, is about 60F. That may be a true statement, but it is not meaningful...
John, the math behind the PowerCal derives useful "power" data in terms of consistent average and normalized power "after the fact" on endurance rides However, the displayed "power" during a ride is too erratic to be immediately helpful. Likewise, cardiac drift (especially during hot & humid summer days) has also proven to be an issue (at least for me) as the data in the second half of a ride demonstrates a higher power output. In reality, my heart rate is going up and my power is going down. Dehydration and fatigue do affect heart rate and therefore "power" data from the PowerCal.

I do find it interesting that PowerCal data is also quite similar to the trainer "virtual power" on my Gen III (with a CycleOps Jet Fluid Pro) . Therefore, I see no reason to dismiss the PowerCal as a device that is not useful at this point in time.

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 7:53 am
by Velocomp
My tone might have been a bit over the top (sorry!), but you've outlined yourself why PowerCal data has very limited usefulness.

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:49 pm
by ldmitruk
BruceK wrote:
Velocomp wrote:I believe the PowerCal transmits its "power" data over ANT+. Assuming it does, do a Scan and it will pair as a DFPM.

I've seen PowerCal data. Saying that it is similar to real power data over endurance rides is like saying the high temperature in New York City, averaged over a one year period, is about 60F. That may be a true statement, but it is not meaningful...
John, the math behind the PowerCal derives useful "power" data in terms of consistent average and normalized power "after the fact" on endurance rides However, the displayed "power" during a ride is too erratic to be immediately helpful. Likewise, cardiac drift (especially during hot & humid summer days) has also proven to be an issue (at least for me) as the data in the second half of a ride demonstrates a higher power output. In reality, my heart rate is going up and my power is going down. Dehydration and fatigue do affect heart rate and therefore "power" data from the PowerCal.

I do find it interesting that PowerCal data is also quite similar to the trainer "virtual power" on my Gen III (with a CycleOps Jet Fluid Pro) . Therefore, I see no reason to dismiss the PowerCal as a device that is not useful at this point in time.
I don't think using heart to measure power is going to produce good results over time. I find when my fitness levels drop, such as after I had a bad accident and was off for at least a couple of monts, my heart rate will start to rise for a given effort compared to when I was healthy. How is the PowerCal suppose to take that into account let alone the situations you just described.

Cheers!

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:37 pm
by BruceK
ldmitruk wrote:
BruceK wrote:
Velocomp wrote:I believe the PowerCal transmits its "power" data over ANT+. Assuming it does, do a Scan and it will pair as a DFPM.

I've seen PowerCal data. Saying that it is similar to real power data over endurance rides is like saying the high temperature in New York City, averaged over a one year period, is about 60F. That may be a true statement, but it is not meaningful...
John, the math behind the PowerCal derives useful "power" data in terms of consistent average and normalized power "after the fact" on endurance rides However, the displayed "power" during a ride is too erratic to be immediately helpful. Likewise, cardiac drift (especially during hot & humid summer days) has also proven to be an issue (at least for me) as the data in the second half of a ride demonstrates a higher power output. In reality, my heart rate is going up and my power is going down. Dehydration and fatigue do affect heart rate and therefore "power" data from the PowerCal.

I do find it interesting that PowerCal data is also quite similar to the trainer "virtual power" on my Gen III (with a CycleOps Jet Fluid Pro) . Therefore, I see no reason to dismiss the PowerCal as a device that is not useful at this point in time.
I don't think using heart to measure power is going to produce good results over time. I find when my fitness levels drop, such as after I had a bad accident and was off for at least a couple of monts, my heart rate will start to rise for a given effort compared to when I was healthy. How is the PowerCal suppose to take that into account let alone the situations you just described.

Cheers!
It is not necessary for me to justify my experience using a PowerCal and the two years of data I have accumulated with it in comparison to my Gen 3 data. I would suggest that if you are curious and/or have questions, just go out and buy a PowerCal (they are inexpensive) and experiment for yourself. At the very least you will end up with a decent ant+ heart rate strap ;-) And no, I am in no way affiliated with Saris.

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:14 pm
by blp
Velocomp wrote:Hold on to your money for a few days. We will be announcing something very shortly...
Anything more you can tease us with?

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:09 pm
by BruceK

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 12:15 am
by blp
Velocomp wrote:Hold on to your money for a few days. We will be announcing something very shortly...
Anything further John?

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 8:01 am
by Velocomp
blp wrote:
Velocomp wrote:Hold on to your money for a few days. We will be announcing something very shortly...
Anything further John?
Eurobike...

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 5:05 pm
by blp
That's September isn't it?

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:06 pm
by Velocomp
August 26...

Re: Using Cycleops Powercal

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:26 pm
by blp
Exciting!